header-logo header-logo

Use your experts wisely

26 June 2009 / Ayla Dogruyol
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

In times of recession, proportionality over the use of experts is critical,
says Ayla Dogruyol

Married couples are continuing to separate despite the financial difficulties of doing so when assets have devalued and may not be readily realisable. Some will be concerned about the cost implications of formalising their separation and this article highlights two practical steps which parties can consider to contain costs when doing a deal in relation to the finances.

The judge at a final hearing bases his decision on the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 which requires consideration of the financial resources available to the parties now and in the foreseeable future. Consequently, at the outset of any settlement discussions the parties should be satisfied that all the assets have been disclosed. They then have to work out what those assets are worth.

Experts

Parties are first encouraged to try to agree the value of the family assets. In the absence of agreement, or if they do not know the value of the assets, the preferred court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll