header-logo header-logo

Urgent review

19 February 2009 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

The MoJ has been compelled to act on mortgage remedies, says Sarah Greer

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ (CML) prediction for 2009 is that mortgage possessions will rise to about 75,000 by the end of the year. Of these repossessions, the CML expects “a sizeable share” to be buy-to-let borrowers, who have been particularly hard hit by the nervousness of lending institutions over the past months. In the current financial climate, attention has inevitably been focussed on the mechanics of gaining possession of and selling a mortgaged property where the mortgagor has defaulted on repayments. A recent High Court decision in Horsham Properties Group v Clark [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 58 (Oct) has caused such concern that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has started an urgent review into mortgage remedies, and how the law protects borrowers in mortgage arrears.

 

Background: possession and sale

It is well known that the lender has the right to take possession “as soon as the ink is dry” on the mortgage agreement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll