header-logo header-logo

Updates from the courts

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty on the intricacies of will interpretation

It is somehow comforting that, even in this day and age, five law lords can be exercised about the meaning to be attributed to a semi-colon. In Sammut v Manzi [2008] UKPC 58 T died leaving a will in which, by cl 6(ii), 25% of his estate was left “to (a) my cousins…[A], [P], [W] and [J]; and (b) my ex-spouse [R]… in equal shares as to the realty in fee simple and as to the personalty absolutely”. The clause went on to record that if any of A, P, W, J and/or R should predecease T without leaving heirs, “the share of that deceased individual shall be paid… to the surviving beneficiaries…in equal shares and, if…more than one…among all such surviving beneficiaries in equal shares per stirpes.”

Do A, P, W, J and R each take 5% each? Or do the four cousins share 12.5% while R takes the remaining 12.5% herself? The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll