header-logo header-logo

28 April 2021 / Sandra Paul , Rebecca Niblock
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Unlocking digital disclosure

47596
Sandra Paul & Rebecca Niblock investigate a new legislative tool that could be a potential game-changer
  • New guidelines: disclosing digital material.
  • Balance: the right to a fair trial and the right to privacy.
  • Changes on the horizon: the coming into force of the Crime (Overseas Production Order) Act 2019.

Much water has passed under the bridge since January 2018, when the justice system faced a disclosure crisis, particularly in relation to sexual offences. Several high-profile rape trials collapsed, you may recall, due to the failure of the prosecution to disclose digital material. Disclosure is clearly fundamental in ensuring a defendant can receive a fair trial. An improvement plan was launched, the House of Commons’ Justice Committee held an inquiry and the attorney general launched a consultation, resulting in new guidelines in December 2020. These echoed the focus of the media on the impact on complainants who report sexual offences and are frequently required to hand over their mobile phones to investigators. However, questions remain about whether a complainant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll