header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Union discriminated against female members

Legal news update

A trade union unlawfully discriminated against some of its female members when it opted not to pursue a better pay deal for them, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The appeal court ruled in Allen v GMB, that GMB indirectly discriminated against female staff at Middlesbrough Borough Council when it recommended that members accept an equal pay deal, even though it undervalued the women’s claims. The union feared that if the women successfully claimed for the back pay they believed they were entitled to when compared with a group of predominantly male employees, it would threaten negotiations for pay rises for all its members.

Overturning an earlier judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the court held that the union had misrepresented to the women the nature of the deal which was on offer from their employers. Although the aim of securing a fair single status pay deal was legitimate, the court said, the way the union secured the deal was not done in a proportionate manner. The case will now return to the employment tribunal where compensation levels will be assessed.

Macfarlanes solicitor James Baker says: “This is extremely damning, and potentially very expensive, for the GMB. We can expect similar pay deals to come under the judicial microscope as a result.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll