header-logo header-logo

01 December 2023 / Fred Philpott , Sabrina Goodchild
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Consumer
printer mail-detail

PPI: Unfair relationships?

149581
What is a relationship & when does it end? Fred Philpott & Sabrina Goodchild report
  • Considers the case of Smith v Bank of Scotland, concerning PPI mis-selling to credit card customers.
  • Covers the principles relevant to unfair relationships, as set out in Smith.
  • Looks ahead to the pending Supreme Court judgment in Potter v Canada Square Operations.

The word ‘relationship’ is most commonly understood to describe the interactions, feelings and formal arrangements between two human beings. Of course, it has many other uses by way of a description between two or more things, concepts etc. A recent Supreme Court case considered the consumer credit provisions relating to unfair relationships (see Smith and another (Appellant) v Royal Bank of Scotland (Respondent) [2023] UKSC 34).

The origins of the provisions concerning unfair relationships in ss 140A to 140C in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 have their origin in a white paper in December 2003 (Cm 6040). They were introduced into the 1974 Act in place of the provisions regarding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll