header-logo header-logo

PPI: Unfair relationships?

01 December 2023 / Fred Philpott , Sabrina Goodchild
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Consumer
printer mail-detail
149581
What is a relationship & when does it end? Fred Philpott & Sabrina Goodchild report
  • Considers the case of Smith v Bank of Scotland, concerning PPI mis-selling to credit card customers.
  • Covers the principles relevant to unfair relationships, as set out in Smith.
  • Looks ahead to the pending Supreme Court judgment in Potter v Canada Square Operations.

The word ‘relationship’ is most commonly understood to describe the interactions, feelings and formal arrangements between two human beings. Of course, it has many other uses by way of a description between two or more things, concepts etc. A recent Supreme Court case considered the consumer credit provisions relating to unfair relationships (see Smith and another (Appellant) v Royal Bank of Scotland (Respondent) [2023] UKSC 34).

The origins of the provisions concerning unfair relationships in ss 140A to 140C in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 have their origin in a white paper in December 2003 (Cm 6040). They were introduced into the 1974 Act in place of the provisions regarding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll