header-logo header-logo

09 March 2018 / David Bloom
Issue: 7784 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Unexplained Wealth Orders. Explained

nlj_7784_bloom

David Bloom considers UWOs—the newest enforcement measure introduced to tackle money laundering & economic crime

  • Conditions for issuing an order.
  • Consequences of non-compliance

Since 31st January 2018, the enforcement authorities in England and Wales have been empowered with a new investigative tool to tackle money laundering and economic crime: Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs). These widely-trailed measures have been billed as having the potential to redefine the asset recovery regime. However, scrutiny of the statutory framework suggests limitations and challenges in practice indicative of more modest reforms.

Background

Introduced by the Criminal Finances Act 2017, which amended the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002), the aim behind UWOs was set out in the legislation’s Explanatory Notes: to fill the lacuna in the POCA 2002 provisions that often meant enforcement authorities were unable to freeze or recover assets, even when they had reasonable grounds to suspect the identified assets represented the proceeds of crime, due to their inability to obtain evidence —often from overseas jurisdictions.

UWOs do not confer a new power to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll