header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Unequal victims

Pleural plaque sufferers deserve better justice than a UK postal lottery, says Richard Scorer

Pleural plaques are a scarring on the lung caused by exposure to asbestos. Although they can often be a precursor to more serious asbestos related illnesses, for example mesothelioma, they are distinctive from other types of asbestos related conditions in that they are usually symptom free. The person afflicted by pleural plaques will not experience any physical pain or suffering, and in many cases will never become ill at all. However, the person afflicted may become very anxious about the possibility of developing asbestos related disease in the future, so psychological harm may be caused (see 159 NLJ 7396, p 1688 for the previous article on pleural plaques).

This gives rise to a legal problem: where the inhalation of asbestos fibres giving rise to pleural plaques is a result of negligence, eg by an employer, should persons suffering from pleural plaques be entitled to damages in the civil courts? In 2007 the House of Lords decided that, since no actual physical pain

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll