header-logo header-logo

Under review

03 March 2011 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Nichola Evans investigates the reign of uncertainty surrounding success fees

While interested parties have been busy preparing their responses to the government Green Paper on civil costs, the courts have themselves been reviewing the question of success fees. Two cases, one decided in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the other in the Technology and Construction Court, contain heavy criticism of the current system and pose a number of issues for both claimants and defendants who operate in the “no win, no fee” arena.

MGN v United Kingdom (Case No 39401/04)

This is a case which has already garnered a considerable degree of media attention over the past few years.

The claim dates back to 2001 after the Daily Mirror newspaper revealed that the supermodel Naomi Campbell was receiving treatment for drug abuse. Proceedings were brought by Ms Campbell against the Mirror Group which concerned the primary issue as to whether or not that by publishing its story, MGN Limited breached the privacy of Naomi Campbell.  

In the High Court and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll