header-logo header-logo

UK tops Liberty terror holding chart

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

UK terrorist pre-charge detention powers—which the government is proposing to extend still further—already far exceed those in other comparable democracies, a new Liberty study shows.

The research, Terrorism Pre-charge Detention—Comparative Law Study, based on advice and assistance from lawyers and academics around the world, looked at 15 countries, including past and current potential terror targets such as the US, Spain, Russia, and Turkey.

None of these countries is allowed to hold terror suspects without charge for anything close to the 28 days British police are allowed, and yet the government is currently pushing to raise the limit to 56 days.
The US constitution limits pre-charge detention to 48 hours, Russian police are allowed to detain without charge for five days, while Turkish criminal law only permits 7.5 days’ detention before charge.

The report’s editor, Jago Russell, says the study provides further evidence that an increase beyond 28 days can not be justified.
“How can our government argue that the UK needs to hold people for over a month when the US can only hold people for two days and Canada just one?,” he says.

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti says: “Ministers have rightly lectured generals in Burma and Pakistan about their rights record, but human rights, like charity, begins at home.”
 

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll