header-logo header-logo

02 March 2007 / Victoria Howes , Michael Appleby
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

UK plc: limited safety?

UK health and safety laws are under the EC spotlight again. Victoria Howes and Michael Appleby explain why

Not for the first time the European Commission (the Commission) has brought proceedings against the UK alleging non-compliance with European laws in the area of health and safety. Numerous cases were brought in relation to non-compliance with the Working Time Directive 93/104/EC, for example. This time, the Commission alleged that the UK failed to transpose the Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (the Directive) concerning the prevention of occupational risks and the protection of the safety and health of workers (see European Commission v United Kingdom C – 127/05).

The original complaint was launched 10 years ago. The main thrust was that the qualifying phrase ‘so far as is reasonably practicable’ used by the UK in its primary legislation, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974), limited the scope of the employer’s obligation. This, the Commission argues, is incompatible with Art 5 of the Directive.

On 18 January 2007, Advocate General Mengozzi

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll