header-logo header-logo

11 December 2025
Categories: Legal News , Legal services , International , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

UK legal sector flourishes at home & abroad

The legal profession is punching above its weight by pulling in record amounts of money for the UK economy and boosting Britain’s reputation overseas, according to research

Together with the accounting sector, legal services contributed an estimated £30.9bn in tax to the public coffers in 2023, up from £20.5bn in 2020. 

In 2024, UK-based legal services contributed a record £38bn to the UK economy, up more than 3% on the previous year, and employed 364,000 people with two thirds of these based outside London. The figures are contained in professional services lobby group TheCityUK’s report, 'UK legal services 2025: legal excellence, internationally renowned', produced in partnership with Barclays. 

The UK has the second largest legal services market in the world after the US, and hosts offices for more than 200 foreign law firms from about 40 jurisdictions.

London is the most popular seat for international commercial arbitration ‘by a wide margin’, the report, published this week, states. For example, more than 80% of the world’s maritime arbitrations are handled in London. 

UK lawyers are also popular overseas. In 2025, more than 9,000 solicitors of England and Wales and 800 solicitors of Scotland were working outside the UK. Barristers’ chambers, particularly commercial sets, are establishing a permanent presence in locations such as Singapore, Hong Kong, Abu Dhabi, New York, Doha and Geneva.

Miles Celic, chief executive officer, TheCityUK, said: 'The UK’s global reputation as a centre for justice and the rule of law is fundamental to its status as a world-leading international financial centre. 

‘English common law is by far the most popular choice of governing law for cross-border contracts and the UK is the world’s leading centre for international dispute resolution in commercial disputes.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll