header-logo header-logo

12 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tyco renews legal tie-up

Eversheds and manufacturing giant Tyco have agreed to extend their groundbreaking “sole provider” agreement for a further two years.

Eversheds and manufacturing giant Tyco have agreed to extend their groundbreaking “sole provider” agreement for a further two years.
Under the agreement, which began in January 2007, Eversheds became the sole provider of legal services to Tyco across its business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

The deal stripped the company’s legal panel from 280 firms to one and reduced its legal spend by a quarter. Under the original contract, the law firm was awarded a bonus if it could reduce the amount of litigation brought against Tyco.

However, Stephen Hopkins, head of international at Eversheds, says that performance-related bonuses will play no part in the new deal. He says that the bonus system has become “less relevant as the behaviours that were incentivised before have become entrenched in the mindset of their lawyers”.
“The billable hour tends to encourage certain behaviour. You are rewarded on the number of hours that you do and there is no reward for efficiency or value of the work that you are inputting.

We have tried to align the rewards and payment mechanisms to the behaviours that we want to see,” he says.

LexisNexis editor at large Elsa Booth says that although other firms have looked at adopting similar agreements, there are concerns over the long-term viability of such agreements.

“These deals give international clients their holy grail; a degree of control, an element of transparency, as well as the capacity to manage legal spend.

However, the inevitable tie-up to fixed-fees implicit within such arrangements makes firms nervous about jumping in; there is a lot of scepticism about how profitable such arrangements are in reality,” she says

Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll