header-logo header-logo

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Twitter action makes legal history

First injunction served via social networking site

Solicitor and political blogger, Donal Blaney, of Griffin Law, has obtained a landmark order to stop an unknown individual impersonating him on Twitter. The order, which was served on the Twitter site, demands the anonymous Twitterer reveal their identity and stop posting as Donal Blaney.
Blaney, who runs a right-wing blog called Blaney’s Blarney, said the individual contacted him two days after the court order was served, and they have since agreed a four-figure settlement which will be paid to Help the Heroes, Blaney’s charity of choice.

The injunction, now known as “Blaney’s Blarny Order”, was granted on the basis the blogger had breached his copyright. Blaney used legal reasoning similar to that used in Clark v Associated Newspapers, where Conservative politician Alan Clark successfully sued the London Evening Standard for breach of copyright laws conferring a right not to have work falsely attributed to him as an author, and the law of passing off, after they published an article imitating his diary and News of the World column.

An Australian court recently allowed an order to be served on social networking site Facebook. In the US, Google was recently ordered to reveal the identity of an anonymous blogger.

“I acted for someone a month ago who was the victim of fake twitters, and it took Twitter a week to track the person down by their ISP address,” Blaney said.

“When I myself became a victim of an imposter, I decided to act. Since the order, I have been contacted by children’s charities wondering if this can help stop internet bullying.

“As far as I know, this is a world first. Hopefully, it will have some impact on bullies.”
 

New Law Journal is now on Twitter! Go to http://twitter.com/#search?q=newlawjournal

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll