header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tweeting tamed?

Only accredited members of the press will be able to tweet from court, under new proposals from Lord Judge CJ.

The consultation, published this week, follows interim guidance issued in December that judges could accept applications from any individual as long as there was no danger of interference with the administration of justice.

Under the new proposals, instant text-based messages via Twitter, e-mail or mobile phone by accredited members of the media will be allowed during court hearings. The presumption behind this is that “the media will be familiar with the requirements of fair and accurate reporting, that they will abide by the relevant Press Complaints Commission codes of practice, and that they will understand and abide by any reporting restrictions that may be imposed”.

The judge in each case will have discretion as to what is allowed and could extend the privilege to non-accredited members of the media if deemed appropriate.

In the Supreme Court, however, a different code applies. Its president, Lord Phillips, has said legal teams and members of the public as well as journalists can tweet from the highest court in the land because there is “seldom” any need for confidentiality once a case has reached that stage.
 

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll