header-logo header-logo

TRUMPET-BLOWING

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In brief

A campaign has been launched to promote England and Wales as the jurisdiction of choice for international companies to resolve their commercial disputes. Fronted by the Law Society and backed by the government and the City, part of the campaign includes a brochure, England and Wales: the Jurisdiction of Choice, put together by 26 City law firms, which is aimed at international in-house counsel. In the foreword, Jack Straw, secretary of state for justice, says it “is right to trumpet the success of England and Wales as the jurisdiction of choice for the resolution of disputes arising all over the world”.

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll