header-logo header-logo

14 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trump & the Supreme Court

President-elect Trump is likely to have an opportunity to fill four vacancies in the US Supreme Court during his term in office.

And, unlike President Obama, he can expect to find his nominees endorsed by a Senate controlled by his own Republican party, Geoffrey Bindman QC writes in this week’s NLJ. Once appointed, Supreme Court justices are there for life or until voluntary retirement.

Following the death of Antonin Scalia, a conservative, in February, President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, a moderate liberal. However, the Senate deferred the confirmation process pending the election, therefore it will be Trump who makes the decision. A further three justices are aged 83, 80 and 78.

Currently the justices are balanced between the liberal and conservative camps therefore a Trump appointment will tilt the court towards the conservative side. Bindman points out that until one of the elderly liberal judges is replaced, the court is likely to retain its liberal stance on social issues.

However, Bindman says the 1972 Roe v Wade ruling that an absolute prohibition of abortion by any state is unconstitutional is “unlikely to survive a Trump presidency”.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll