header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Paul Dacam , Jamie Potter
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trump Card

Local government accountability beats commercial confidentiality, say Paul Dacam & Jamie Potter

A recent High Court ruling on the interpretation of a legislative provision dating back to the early 19th century is likely to have considerable ramifications for those contracting with local authorities.

In particular, the ruling significantly increases the risk of disclosure of sensitive information provided by contractors to local government authorities, irrespective of any potential commercial prejudice or breach of confidentiality.

The case R (on the application of the Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council [2009] All ER (D) 78 (Oct) involved an application by Veolia for judicial review of the decision of Nottinghamshire County Council (Notts CC) to disclose certain documents relating to a waste management PFI contract between Veolia and Notts CC (the PFI contract) that Veolia had won through a public tender.

The documents in question had been requested by an environmental activist, in his capacity as a local elector, and comprised the payment and performance mechanism and KPI schedules to the PFI contract, as well

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll