header-logo header-logo

Trouble in the shires

04 September 2008 / Laura West , Jonathan Manning
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Should the Crown's powers be limited to prerogative and statute? Laura West and Jonathan Manning report

In R (on the application of Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council and another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 148, [2008] All ER (D) 25 (Mar), the Court of Appeal held that a non-statutory scheme used by the secretary of state for communities and local government for the re-organisation of local government in the “shire” areas of England is lawful, notwithstanding the existing statutory scheme but that steps taken under the scheme had no legal effect until passage through Parliament of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.

Background

In October 2006 the secretary of state announced her intention to reorganise local government in selected areas of England to remove two-tier structures, ie county and borough councils in the same areas, replacing them with unitary authorities so as to improve service delivery and to make costs savings. She simultaneously published a white paper and a document

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll