header-logo header-logo

Tribunal fees have deterrent effect

11 September 2014
Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Official figures reveal a steep decline in the number of employment claims raised in the UK since tribunal fees were introduced last year.

Ministry of Justice (MoJ) statistics published this week show a 59% drop in cases lodged between August 2013 and the end of March 2014 compared to the same eight-month period in the previous year (16,206 compared to 39,567).

The period between April and June 2014 also showed a decrease (4,245 claims lodged compared to 13,899 in the same quarter the previous year) but the figures are not comparable due to the introduction of early conciliation in April. All potential claims must now be referred to Acas before they can be lodged, which delays cases by up to one month.

Potential litigants have, since 29 July 2013, been required to pay an issue fee to lodge a claim and a hearing fee to proceed to a full hearing. While fees can be reduced or waived in certain circumstances, this is rarely granted. Fees range from £160 to £250 to issue a claim, and £230 to £950 for a hearing.

According to Innes Clark, head of employment law at Morton Fraser, the statistics will increase pressure on the government to reform the system.

“Whilst employers should not be faced with spurious claims, the impact of the fee requirements has been to create a major barrier to access to justice,” he says. 

“The fee regime has unfairly hit low paid workers in particular, who should not be deterred, on grounds of cost, from pursuing legitimate claims. The publication of these statistics is further strong evidence that reform is needed.”

Trade union Unison unsuccessfully challenged the fee regime in the High Court earlier this year. An appeal is scheduled to be heard next week (18 September). The Labour Party has said it will reform the fees regime if it forms the next government.

 

Issue: 7622 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll