header-logo header-logo

Trial technology (Pt 3)

20 April 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_fletcher_0

In their third update on trial technology Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh discuss the drivers for change

The legal community has perhaps been too slow to adopt electronic technology at trial, but, despite the ‘stumbling blocks’ discussed in the last update (see ‘Trial technology’ (Pt 2), 13 April 2018), there are now a number of drivers for change.

First, the courts are increasingly encouraging the use of court-room technology. The shift to mandatory e-filing in the Business & Property Courts is a step in this direction; the obvious progression from paperless filing is paperless bundles. From a purely practical perspective, e-bundles will be far easier for court staff to manage, they take no storage space at court, and are therefore likely to save costs.

Judges also now appreciate the advantages of technology more and, as time passes, are inevitably becoming more digitally astute. Several years ago, many High Court judges would have regarded the idea of an electronic trial bundle with suspicion. Now, the question we are increasingly seeing asked at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll