header-logo header-logo

To treat or not to treat?

29 October 2009 / Adam Hundt
Issue: 7391 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

What happens when migrants can’t pay for treatment? asks Adam Hundt

The NHS (Charges to Overseas Visitors) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/306) (the regulations) provide that overseas visitors must be charged for secondary care they receive, unless one of the many exemptions in the regulations applies.

Some types of treatment are exempt from charging, eg for infectious diseases such as TB, or STDs, but not for HIV; some types of patient are exempt from charges, eg refugees or people who have been lawfully resident in the UK for more than 12 months; and some types of nationality are exempt, eg people from countries with a reciprocal agreement with the UK.

Interestingly, both primary and secondary legislation in this area concentrates solely on charging for treatment. No mention is made of withholding treatment but the obvious question, once a charging regime comes into being, is what happens when a patient cannot pay?

The Department of Health issued detailed non-statutory guidance on the implementation of the regulations which addressed this problem to some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll