header-logo header-logo

Tread carefully

28 October 2011 / Georgina Squire
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigators beware: settlement may not be good news, warns Georgina Squire

The most satisfying part of a litigator’s role is often settling a dispute. However, two recent decisions demostrate the risks involved. They offer words of warning and lessons to be learned for every litigation solicitor negotiating a settlement on behalf of their client.

Settling claim without authority

Amalgamated Metal Corporation Plc v Wragge & Co [2011] EWHC 887 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 114 (Apr) concerned tax litigation in which Wragge was acting for the Amalgamated Metal Corporation Plc (AMC). The main allegation against the solicitor firm was that it settled a claim without its client’s authority, in breach of its retainer and was negligent.

On the primary case of want of authority, AMC succeeded. The judge reached his conclusion based on both the documentary and witness evidence. He concluded that Wragge had never put the final offer to the client, so the client had not had the opportunity of considering it or instructing Wragge to accept it. One of the main

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll