header-logo header-logo

Transfer complications

11 March 2014 / William Robins
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

William Robins outlines the challenges involved when a case pursued under a CFA is transferred to another firm

There are two undisputed truths at play in the legal sector at present:

  • first, clients want their lawyers to think out of the box and to “risk share”;
  • second, the pressures on partners with client followings from overheads, clients, and competitors have led to more partner-level lawyers moving.

When you put the above two factors together, it is not surprising to learn that it is commonplace for cases pursued under a conditional fee agreement (CFA) to move from one firm to another. Transferring files between firms is not easy at the best of times; one has to consider unpaid fees, work in progress (WIP), the impact on all three parties (the client and both firms) and, of course, compliance with the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) Code.

These complications are greatly increased where the case to be transferred is subject to a CFA entered into before April

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll