header-logo header-logo

Trans participation in rugby: an unlawful exclusion?

24 February 2023 / Michael Walker , Nadjia Zychowicz
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Features , Equality , Sports law , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
112067
For LGBT+ History Month, Michael Walker & Nadjia Zychowicz explore the legality of the Rugby Football Union’s ban on transgender women competing in female-only forms of their games
  • The Rugby Football Union’s ban against transgender women playing women’s contact rugby breaches the Equality Act 2010.
  • The ban is not a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim of protecting the safety and fairness of the sport.

Last summer, by a vote of 33 to 26, the English Rugby Football Union (RFU) voted for changes to its gender participation policy. These changes meant players could only participate in women’s contact rugby ‘if the sex originally recorded at birth is female’, resulting in a blanket ban against transwomen participating in the sport.

When evaluated in the context of the UK’s legislative framework for equality and human rights, this ban breaches the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010).

EqA 2010 protects people from discrimination on the basis of their protected characteristic(s) in certain spheres of society—such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll