header-logo header-logo

Tragedy could have been avoided

An NHS trust and former ward manager have been found guilty of Health and Safety Act breaches but cleared of corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter, respectively, following the death of Alice Figueiredo

Figueiredo, 22, died in 2015 while a mental health inpatient at Goodmayes Hospital, run by North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT). She had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and an eating disorder, and a history of self-harm. Despite 18 attempts to harm herself with plastic bin liners, these were not removed from the ward, with fatal consequences for Figueiredo.

The verdict, delivered at the Old Bailey this week, followed 24 days of deliberation by the jury, the joint-longest in English legal history.   

James Broomhall, senior associate at Grosvenor Law, said: ‘This case highlights the difficulty of establishing criminal liability for institutional failings, even when there is evidence of repeated and documented lapses.

‘It also raises important questions about patient autonomy, clinical judgment, and the limits of individual responsibility in high-pressure healthcare environments. The jury’s 125 hours of deliberation reflect the legal and factual complexity involved in prosecuting systemic failings in mental health care.

‘That this was only the second corporate manslaughter case brought against an NHS trust illustrates how rarely the law is used in this context. While accountability remains vital, there is also a risk that criminal proceedings, particularly against individual staff, could deter professionals from entering or staying in the mental health sector.’

Deborah Coles, director of INQUEST, said: ‘Alice’s death is the result of repeated failings within NELFT and a culture of neglect and complacency at management level that continues to endanger lives.

‘This was a death forewarned by her mother. This is also about the systemic failures that pervade our mental health services across the country and the lack of consequences for those in charge.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll