header-logo header-logo

Trade marks

11 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

PI-Design AG and other companies v Yoshida Metal Industry Co Ltd C-337/12 P to C-340/12 P, [2014] All ER (D) 286 (Mar)

Pursuant to Art 4 of Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 (on the Community trade mark) (the Regulation), so far as Community trade marks were concerned, a sign representing the shape of a product fell among the signs which might constitute a trade mark provided that it was capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing the products or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. It was also apparent from the case-law of the Court that each of the grounds for refusal of registration listed in Art 7(1) of the Regulation should be interpreted in the light of the public interest underlying that ground. In that context, the Court had had occasion to point out that Art 7(1)(e)(ii) of the Regulation was intended to prevent trade mark law granting an undertaking a monopoly on technical solutions or functional characteristics of a product. Further, the court had also had occasion to make clear that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll