header-logo header-logo

10 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Tracking the legal market

Employment, tax and commercial law practices have continued to grow during the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit at a slower rate than in Q1, according to the second LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index, which tracks legal activity levels.

However, property, immigration, crime and litigation have been the areas of law hardest hit.

Just as gross domestic product (GDP) tracks the level of output in the overall economy, the GLP Index tracks a basket of metrics which are representative of legal activity levels. The latest index, released this week, found an overall legal market decline of 6.9% in Q2 2020.

The change to new ways of working, as well as workplace uncertainty and restructures, have increased the need for legal advice, creating 4% growth in employment law. Tax law enjoyed almost 14% growth, perhaps benefiting from the furlough scheme and government backed loans, and commercial was one of the best overall performing areas.

An expected surge in restructuring and insolvency work had not materialised midway through the year―this practice area declined by more than 18%.

Property law activity was 31% lower than in 2019, with the housing market brought to a near-standstill by the spring lockdown. The closure of courts and move to remote justice for urgent cases has also taken its toll on dispute resolution and litigation, which fell by 20% in civil and family disputes, while the throughput of court fell by 75%. The GDL Index model predicts that, while there is likely to be pent-up demand, the bounce back is likely to be small and short.

The Index report’s author, Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis, said: ‘The report has brought data and insight to the legal industry. Complicated and difficult decisions lie ahead.

‘The GLP will give firms the chance to review their market positioning, see how they are performing and chart a route to future growth.’

The report can be viewed here.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll