header-logo header-logo

Town & country planning

18 January 2013
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Gray) v Southwark London Borough and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1738, [2013] All ER (D) 13 (Jan)

It was settled law, following R (on the application of Blewett) v Derbyshire County Council [2003] All ER (D) 332 (Nov), that the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/293) recognised that an environmental statement might well be deficient and make provision through the publicity and consultation process for any deficiencies to be identified so that the resulting “environmental information” provided the local planning authority with as full a picture as possible. There would be cases where the document purporting to be an environmental statement was so deficient that it could not reasonably be described as an environmental statement defined by the 1999 Regulations, but they were likely to be few and far between.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll