header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 July 2016 / Dr Tony Harvey
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Towards the new Hammurabi?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The SRA’s attempt to introduce a code of solicitors’ ethics fit for the 21st century should be applauded, says Dr Tony Harvey
  • The SRA wants a clear, easy to understand, professional code of ethics for all solicitors and an entirely separate code relating to the obligations of the business. This approach is both radical and commendable.

Codes telling humanity how to live in the “right” way are nothing new. Perhaps the first is the Code of Hammurabi dating back some 3,000 years. Codes of professional ethics have similar provenance. Many will have heard of the Hippocratic Oath (School of Hippocrates around 420 BC) providing an ethical provenance for doctors and surgeons (“those who cut for stone”). Solicitors’ ethical provenance is rather more modern—the first Guide to the Professional Conduct of Solicitors having been published in 1960.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the largest regulator of solicitors in the UK and the last major review of the Solicitors Code of Conduct was in 2010 giving rise to the SRA Code of Conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll