header-logo header-logo

07 July 2020
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Top firms sign Race Fairness Commitment

Magic Circle, global and City law firms have signed a pledge to implement data-driven measures to tackle the career obstacles that unfairly hold back black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) lawyers

The Race Fairness Commitment (RFC), signed by 17 top law firms, mandates close analysis of quantitative data and monitoring of progress from recruitment to senior promotion so firms can identify the points at which BAME lawyers face a disadvantage.

The RFC includes measures to ensure junior ethnic minority lawyers have access to senior management, and race and racism are talked about in every induction and exit interview. Interview and offer rates, retention rates, pay and promotion rates will be actively monitored as they relate to ethnic minority lawyers; and, where appropriate, published. There is an explicit commitment to foster workplaces where ‘everyone can have authenticity of speech and culture―no more fitting in and no more being “othered”’.

The initiative has been organised by the firms in partnership with Rare, a diversity recruitment specialist. While most leading law firms now recruit graduate trainees that are as ethnically diverse as the population, this diversity has not been maintained at management level. According to Rare’s own research, BAME lawyers spend on average 20% less time at firms than their white colleagues before leaving.

Raphael Mokades, founder and managing director of Rare, said: ‘What seems possible in terms of racial justice has shifted this year, and the Race Fairness Commitment is about real change. It’s a brave step for the law firms to take, as well as a necessary one. It goes beyond merely not discriminating, and it goes beyond the usual diversity and inclusion activities you see at many organisations. For law firms, it’s about recognising a problem and hunting it down, and I’m delighted that so many have taken this major step.’

Roy Appiah, Rare alumnus and senior associate at Clifford Chance, said: ‘I’ve sometimes had to take the bass out of my voice.

‘I’ve felt unable to express frustration, even when that frustration was justifiable. I used to feel cautious about leading, or taking on additional responsibilities, out of concern that any failing of mine would confirm that people like me do not belong.

‘It is no coincidence that I am a better lawyer when I feel I can be myself.’

For further details about the RFC, view: www.Racefairnesscommitment.com.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll