The Online Safety Act: too little, too late?

22 March 2024 / Thomas Rudkin , Emily Costello

Issue: 8064 / Categories: Features , Cyber , Cybercrime , Technology , Privacy , Criminal , Artificial intelligence

A timely step in the right direction or a late arrival? Thomas Rudkin & Emily Costello share their verdict on the Online Safety Act

The Online Safety Act 2023 sets out criminal offences relating to malicious online activity, including cyberflashing, revenge porn, and threatening communications.
‘Deepfakes’ and the rapid rise of online communications have brought these offences to public attention recently. Has the Act come at the right time to address new technologies—including those yet to come—or has the damage already been done?

The long-awaited Online Safety Act 2023, says the government, aims to make the UK ‘the safest place in the world to be online’. Whether the Act meets this aim is yet to be seen, with most provisions yet to come into force. However, it contains ambitious new provisions and obligations that have the potential to change the legal landscape dramatically. One of the ways it does this is by creating a litany of new criminal offences.

From 31 January

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

The Online Safety Act: too little, too late?

A timely step in the right direction or a late arrival? Thomas Rudkin & Emily Costello share their verdict on the Online Safety Act

The Online Safety Act 2023 sets out criminal offences relating to malicious online activity, including cyberflashing, revenge porn, and threatening communications.
‘Deepfakes’ and the rapid rise of online communications have brought these offences to public attention recently. Has the Act come at the right time to address new technologies—including those yet to come—or has the damage already been done?

From 31 January

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties

The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings

NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices

Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?

Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President

Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year

Tax shock ahead for partners?

Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget

Error message

The Online Safety Act: too little, too late?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington