23 March 2012 / Gerard Forlin

Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory

printer

mail-detail

Too hot to handle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

istock_000009520036medium_4

The heat is on for organisations & individuals who do not pay heed to fire safety precautions, notes Gerard Forlin QC

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (SI 2005/1541) (2005 Order) came into force on 1 October 2006, replacing regulations made under the Fire Precautions Act 1971 (FPA 1971). This order was made pursuant to the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (RRA 2001) to be in compliance with the EU directive on fire safety in the workplace and business premises. There have been a series of recent cases where the fines have been gradually ramping up.

First relevant case?

Arguably, the first relevant case fell under the previous legislation. In R v ESB Hotels Ltd [2005] EWCA Crim 132, [2005] All ER (D) 159 (Jan) owners of a hotel pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the requirements of a Fire Certificate, contrary to s 4 of FPA 1971. Bed mattresses had been stored in various corridors. Investigators found that the hotel staff did not appear to have a complete

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Too hot to handle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

istock_000009520036medium_4

The heat is on for organisations & individuals who do not pay heed to fire safety precautions, notes Gerard Forlin QC

The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (SI 2005/1541) (2005 Order) came into force on 1 October 2006, replacing regulations made under the Fire Precautions Act 1971 (FPA 1971). This order was made pursuant to the Regulatory Reform Act 2001 (RRA 2001) to be in compliance with the EU directive on fire safety in the workplace and business premises. There have been a series of recent cases where the fines have been gradually ramping up.

First relevant case?

Arguably, the first relevant case fell under the previous legislation. In R v ESB Hotels Ltd [2005] EWCA Crim 132, [2005] All ER (D) 159 (Jan) owners of a hotel pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the requirements of a Fire Certificate, contrary to s 4 of FPA 1971. Bed mattresses had been stored in various corridors. Investigators found that the hotel staff did not appear to have a complete

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

back-to-top-scroll