header-logo header-logo

26 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Times loss

Journalist loses appeal in Supreme Court over Freedom of Information request

A journalist for The Times has lost his Supreme Court case to force the Charity Commission to release documents relating to an inquiry into George Galloway MP’s Mariam Appeal charity. 

The Mariam Appeal was launched by Galloway in 1998 following the imposition of sanctions against Iraq. The Commission’s inquiry took place in 2003-2004.

Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20 concerned the question of whether the fact documents held by a public authority pursuant to an inquiry are statutorily exempt from Freedom of Information Act requests for 30 years after the inquiry, is a breach of Art 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Justices dismissed Kennedy’s appeal, since an absolute exemption from disclosure existed as a matter of ordinary statutory construction.

David White, solicitor, IP and commercial, Rollits, says: “Interestingly, both Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath stated that Mr Kennedy had a right to receive the requested information pursuant to his right to freedom of expression under Art 10 of the ECHR. 

“Furthermore, they held that the absolute exemption granted by s 32(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be read so that it expires at the end of the relevant inquiry rather than expiring 30 years following the completion of the inquiry. In my view, if the position of Lords Wilson and Carnwarth were upheld, public inquiries would be subject to earlier scrutiny and comment leading, potentially, to greater openness and transparency on public authorities.  

“This surely reflects the overall intention behind freedom of information. If this had been the prevailing view, however, it could have had a chilling effect on the effective conduct of inquiries. It could have caused a reluctance by third parties to be forthcoming in the provision of full information to a public authority conducting an inquiry, the irony being that such a chilling effect has the potential to reduce the very transparency FOIA seeks to uphold.”

Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll