header-logo header-logo

01 December 2023 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Features , Profession , Coronial law , Coroners
printer mail-detail

Time to give coroners’ reports more clout

149228
It’s time for an independent body to ensure coroners’ recommendations are implemented, writes Veronica Cowan
  • Suggests ways to ensure coronial recommendations are followed and implemented.
  • Refers to recommendation by an Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody report for an independent body to ensure the implementation of coroners’ recommendations.

Following an inquest, coroners don’t reach a legally binding verdict in the way a jury in a criminal trial does. Nor is a binding judgment issued, as in a civil action. Instead, they can only issue prevention of future death (PFDs) reports if they have perceived evidence of failures leading to a death. The chief coroner’s guidance on such reports describes them as vitally important: ‘If society is to learn from deaths... a bereaved family wants to be able to say it was tragic and terrible, but at least it’s less likely to happen to somebody else.’

But evidence suggests that the preventative potential of such reports is not being fully realised, and some families have even criticised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll