header-logo header-logo

30 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time up for retirement?

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

New EHRC proposals include government-led incentives for employers to offer flexible working for all employees, and government funding for workplace training in age management and flexibility. The House of Lords is currently debating whether to include the default retirement age in the Equality Bill, which could fast-track its removal.

Currently, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 allow employers to compulsorily retire workers at 65. The ruling in the high-profile “Heyday” case, last September, held the default retirement age to be lawful, although the judge, Mr Justice Blake, observed that there was a “compelling” argument for the age to be raised beyond 65. The government will review the default retirement age later this year.

An EHRC survey, Older workers: employment preferences, barriers and solutions, published this week, found 24% of men and 64% of women planned to keep working beyond the state pension age (currently 60 for women and 65 for men). Some 85% of people not working and over the state pension age say greater availability of part-time or flexible jobs would help them gain a job.

Baroness Margaret Prosser, deputy chairman of the EHRC, says: “Our research shows that to provide real opportunity to older workers, abolishing the default retirement age needs to be accompanied by a concerted drive by government, employers and agencies to meet the health, caring and work needs of the over-50s to enable them to remain in the workplace.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll