header-logo header-logo

Time to get smart(er)

19 November 2015 / Greg Wildisen
Issue: 7677 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7677_wildisen

Can artificial intelligence ease legal aid pressure points? Greg Wildisen puts the case for technology

Legal aid was introduced in 1949. At that time nearly 80% of British people were eligible. Recently there have been hefty cuts to the system with another £220m expected to be cut each year until 2018. There is also a hike in the number of people seeking free legal assistance, with some pro bono organisations recording a 50% increase in requests for assistance in 2014–15. This leaves legal aid practitioners with the challenge of having to do more with less—less legal experts available to provide advice, and fewer resources to help with the growing demand to “push paper” around an inefficient system.

Artificial intelligence (AI), often referred to as cognitive computing, takes many forms, but most can be conveniently grouped into three broad areas: robotics; machine learning; and smart apps, previously referred to as expert systems.

Smart apps are technologies that connect complex content and expert analysis of that content to provide precise, immediate answers. These systems rather than being probabilistic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll