header-logo header-logo

06 January 2017 / Spencer Keen
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Time to adjust

nlj_7728_keen

Spencer Keen explores the limits of the duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees

  • ​The duty to make adjustments requires an employer to take steps to avoid a disadvantage caused to a disabled employee by any of its provisions, criteria or practices.

Is a disabled employee who is transferred to a new role because he is unable to perform the old one entitled to keep his original salary even though the salary for his new role is normally lower? This was the difficult question the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has tasked with answering in the case of G4S Cash Solution Ltd v Mr Powell UKEAT/0243/15/RN. The EAT’s answer leaves employers more vulnerable to employee’s claims for additional pay (including sick pay) than was previously the case.

The facts

G4S was in the business of replenishing and maintaining cash machines. It employed engineers for this purpose. Mr Powell was employed as an engineer when he began to experience a problem with his lower back which led to him becoming unfit to perform jobs involving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll