header-logo header-logo

06 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Thumbs up for Safe Harbor replacement

The EU-US Privacy Shield Framework—the replacement for Safe Harbor—provides an “essentially equivalent” level of protection for personal data, a report by Hogan Lovells has found.

Safe Harbor, which governed the exchange of personal data across the Atlantic, was declared invalid by the European Court of Justice in October 2015, creating anxiety for many commercial businesses who rely on the transfer of data. The Shield was conceived in February as a replacement for Safe Harbor by the European Commission and US Department of Commerce.

Hogan Lovell’s report, Legal Analysis of the EU-US Privacy Shield, found that the framework substantially meets the criteria for adequacy under Art 25(6) of the data protection Directive.

Eduardo Ustaran, partner at Hogan Lovells, and lead author of the report, says: "The Privacy Shield is crucial in bridging the gap between European and American approaches to privacy and it is therefore essential that it can be relied upon with complete certainty.

"Given the pressures to ensure that personal data transferred from the EU to the US is protected in accordance with European standards, the Privacy Shield will be subject to strict scrutiny by regulators and the courts as it becomes an established framework for compliance. Accordingly, assessing and determining the robustness and legal validity of the Privacy Shield is a business and political necessity."

The Privacy Shield is not yet in effect. It is currently under review by an EU working party, which will deliver its opinion in the coming weeks. The European Commission will then formally vote on it.

Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll