header-logo header-logo

18 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7337 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Third party inspection of Tomlin orders

Janna Purdie considers when courts can order inspection of the schedules annexed to Tomlin orders

Tomlin orders and confidentiality

The court may grant an order to a defendant allowing inspection of Tomlin order schedules reached between the claimant and other defendants. In doing so the court should respect the confidentiality of the parties to the Tomlin order.

Facts of the case

In an application brought under CPR 5.4B(1), eBay, one of the defendants, requested inspection of settlement agreements between the claimant and individual defendants, which were set out in the schedules to Tomlin orders. It was argued, on behalf of the eBay, that it was necessary and proportionate that eBay should be able to see the basis on which the claims had been settled by the claimant with the other defendants. The reason for this was that all of the defendants were joint tortfeasors. Therefore, unless the claimants had reserved their right in the settlement agreements to continue to pursue eBay, the settlement reached by the claimants with the other defendants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll