header-logo header-logo

13 May 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7978 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Act 2022

81380
Michael Zander on the final stages
  • Parliamentary ping-pong—Lords’ amendments and government changes.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill received Royal Assent on 28 April, 13 months after it was first introduced. The Lords spent 11 days on the committee stage and six days on the report stage. That resulted in no less than 161 amendments. Many were changes made by the government to its own Bill—though a considerable number had been stimulated by the opposition. There were also changes made by the Lords that were government defeats, but almost all of these were reversed by the Commons.

The provisions triggered by extreme Extinction Rebellion protests were first introduced just before midnight on 24 November 2021, at the very end of the committee stage in the Lords. But because of the late hour, their controversial content, the fact that they had not been considered by the Commons and the short notice, the government did not put them to the vote that night. They were re-introduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll