header-logo header-logo

09 January 2026 / Joanna Newton
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Family , Pensions , Divorce , Equality
printer mail-detail

The pension split

239519
The humble pension sharing order is 25 years old: if you’re not celebrating, you should be, says Joanna Newton
  • A discussion of pension sharing orders (PSOs) and the role pensions play in financial remedy.
  • Explains why PSOs are underused, and highlights the importance of ensuring clients understand their short, medium and long-term financial considerations.

Twenty-five years of pension sharing orders (PSOs) is unlikely to be marked on many calendars. Nevertheless, the recent anniversary of the first order to be issued should not go unnoticed, primarily as an opportunity to highlight their value in ensuring long-term financial security for divorcees.

What are PSOs?

Pension sharing orders are sub-orders made within a financial consent order as part of financial remedy proceedings upon divorce. They essentially do what they say on the tin: they enable the sharing of a portion of one party’s pension with the other party to ensure a fair split of the matrimonial assets upon divorce.

PSOs will identify how much pension is to be transferred to the receiving

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll