header-logo header-logo

The Manchester Bombing Inquiry: a lasting legacy?

117938
Will the findings of the inquiry into the Manchester Arena bombing prevent the same mistakes happening in the future? Richard Scorer & Shane Smith assess its conclusions
  • The inquiry into the Manchester Arena bombing in 2017 has exposed a multitude of issues leading up to and surrounding the attack.
  • Areas examined by the inquiry include security arrangements at the arena; the response of the emergency services; and the radicalisation of the bomber and the preventability of the attack.
  • The inquiry chair has emphasised the need to ensure that its recommendations are fully implemented, so that it may leave a lasting legacy of improvement.

On 22 May 2017, Salman Abedi, a young man born in Manchester but of Libyan parentage, detonated a homemade improvised explosive device at the Manchester Arena. Abedi seems to have been motivated by the ideology of the Islamic State. The bomb exploded at the end of a concert by the American pop singer Ariana Grande, in an area

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll