header-logo header-logo

The Family Court of the Future

12 August 2020 / Sheena Cassidy Hope
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail
25807
Remote hearings, video hearings or no hearing at all? Sheena Cassidy Hope considers how the family courts might evolve

In brief

  • New ways of working could present opportunities for a more streamlined, 21st century Family Court.
  • Changes must ensure that access to justice is properly maintained, particularly for the most vulnerable in society.

Reform of the Family Court is not a new topic. The current HMCTS reform programme was launched in 2016, with a stated vision of modernising and upgrading the justice system so that it works better for all users. While the increased use of online applications, a move towards paperless courts and ‘fully’ video hearings were key aspects of the reform programme, few could have anticipated these becoming widespread practice within a matter of weeks (and in some instances, days). But with the lockdown imposed in March by the Government to suppress the spread of COVID-19 causing the courts, legal profession and litigants to unexpectedly partake in a sudden and unorthodox pilot, to what

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Payne Hicks Beach—Craig Parrett

Insolvency and restructuring practice welcomes new partner

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll