header-logo header-logo

The assault on liberty updated

14 January 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail
68391
Michael Zander QC considers the Justice Secretary’s plans for a modern Bill of Rights

In 2009, Dominic Raab then a youngish lawyer, a year before becoming an MP, wrote The assault on liberty—what went wrong with rights? (Fourth Estate). It urged that, while remaining a member of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act 1998 (the Act) should be replaced by a British Bill of Rights to ‘focus our judiciary on its primary task, which is to give effect to British rights instead of trying to divine and decipher the murky case law emanating from Strasbourg’.

No one could sensibly have imagined then that a little over a decade later Raab would be Justice Secretary, (pictured) heading government decision-making on reforming the Act.

What’s proposed?

On 14 December 2021, the Justice Secretary published ‘Human Rights Act reforma modern Bill of Rights’, a consultation paper setting out the government’s proposals and inviting answers to 29 questions by 8 March. On the same day, he published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll