header-logo header-logo

The assault on liberty updated

14 January 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail
68391
Michael Zander QC considers the Justice Secretary’s plans for a modern Bill of Rights

In 2009, Dominic Raab then a youngish lawyer, a year before becoming an MP, wrote The assault on liberty—what went wrong with rights? (Fourth Estate). It urged that, while remaining a member of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act 1998 (the Act) should be replaced by a British Bill of Rights to ‘focus our judiciary on its primary task, which is to give effect to British rights instead of trying to divine and decipher the murky case law emanating from Strasbourg’.

No one could sensibly have imagined then that a little over a decade later Raab would be Justice Secretary, (pictured) heading government decision-making on reforming the Act.

What’s proposed?

On 14 December 2021, the Justice Secretary published ‘Human Rights Act reforma modern Bill of Rights’, a consultation paper setting out the government’s proposals and inviting answers to 29 questions by 8 March. On the same day, he published

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll