header-logo header-logo

Test for rescinding decree nisi

27 September 2023
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-detail
The Court of Appeal has confirmed the approach the court should take to an application to rescind a decree nisi, in a landmark judgment

In Cazalet v Abu-Jalaf [2023] EWCA Civ 1065, the court overturned Mr Justice Mostyn’s dismissal of Olga Cazalet’s application to rescind a decree nisi and decision to grant the decree absolute sought by Walid Abu-Zalaf.

The couple married in June 2012 after signing a prenuptial agreement, which provided for the wife to receive increasing levels of financial provision upon divorce depending on number of years from marriage to separation. The couple separated in August 2013. Decree nisi was pronounced in November 2013 but neither party sought to make the decree absolute. The prenuptial agreement was not implemented as the husband continued to maintain his wife and children.

However, the wife said the couple reconciled from November 2014 until March 2020. The husband denied this, asserting that while the relationship ‘rekindled’ it was not a marital reconciliation. In 2021, the wife applied to rescind the decree nisi, aiming to file a fresh divorce application which would treat the marriage as having lasted eight years. The husband responded by applying for the decree nisi to be made absolute.

The Court of Appeal unanimously confirmed a reconciliation had taken place, which altered the duration of marriage and consequent financial provision.

Delivering the main judgment, Lady Justice King said the wife’s application ‘falls comfortably within’ the ground of ‘new event or material change of circumstances’, as set out by Cobb J in NP v TP (Divorce) [2022[EWFC 78.

King LJ held Mostyn J applied the wrong test when he required the wife to prove marital reconciliation on the judge’s own qualitative assessment and that it would be contrary to the interests of justice not to rescind the decree.

Peter Burgess, partner at Burgess Mee Family Law, representing Cazalet, said: ‘In place of the trial judge’s review of arcane law and qualitative assessment of the marriage, the Court of Appeal has substituted one simple test that requires the court to evaluate a change in circumstance to see whether a decree nisi should be set aside.’

Issue: 8042 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll