header-logo header-logo

Telco headache

16 August 2007 / Benoit Reillier , Matthew Bennett
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Does the “new” EU regulatory framework spell the end of integrated telecoms companies? ask Matthew Bennett and Benoit Reillier

The current EU telecoms regulatory framework, the so-called 2003 new regulatory framework (NRF), is now four years old. However, a “new” NRF will be proposed before the end of the year. There is currently a consultation (see www.ec.europa.eu./information_society/policy/ecomm/tomorrow/index_en.htm) to revisit the 2003 NRF, which is trying to capture the views of various stakeholders in the market to update the framework, adapt it to new markets and technological realities, and remove some of the provisions that are no longer relevant.

The current NRF contains a set of approaches and methodologies that EU member states need to follow. As part of the framework, the European Commission lists the remedies available to the national regulatory authorities (NRA) to curb the dominance of firms with significant market power. While national regulatory authorities are allowed to propose their own market definitions or remedies if they believe their national circumstances require them to deviate from the framework, this option

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll