header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

16 May 2019 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In his roundup of the latest tax cases, Peter Vaines minds the GAAP, & ponders the difference between a car & a van

  • The tax position of goodwill of a professional practice.
  • Deciding whether a building is a ‘dwelling’.
  • Cars, vans and income tax on a benefit in kind.
  • Minding the GAAP.

The recent case of Richard Villar v HMRC [2018] TC 6983 considered the tax implications of a sale of goodwill by a professional person, and is very helpful in clarifying the law in this area.

Mr Villar had a successful medical practice and he sold the business as a going concern to Spire Healthcare Diagnostics Limited for £1m. Mr Villar said that the consideration should be assessed to capital gains tax. However, HMRC argued that the payment was subject to income tax.

A crucial part of the HMRC argument was that virtually the whole of the payment was attributable to goodwill and they said it could not be transferred to Spire because the goodwill was personal to him.

HMRC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll