header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

09 August 2018 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail
nlj_7805_vaines

Peter Vaines , tax guru & part-time bard, tackles the latest cases hitting the tax headlines, from over-reliance on residence to unlikely costs awards

  • Interest paid by a UK company under a foreign loan facility is nonetheless UK source.
  • The conundrum presented by the tax motive tests.
  • Letting property can represent a business qualifying for business property relief, being more than the mere holding of an investment.
  • Costs awarded at the First-tier Tribunal due to one of the parties acting unreasonably in the proceedings.

The Court of Appeal has now published its decision in Ardmore Construction Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2018] EWCA Civ 1438, [2018] All ER (D) 143 (Jun) which was concerned with the meaning of UK source income—and therefore whether interest paid by the company was subject to deduction of tax at source.

There are some really difficult issues here, but the decisions of the Upper Tribunal and Court of Appeal (which upheld the decision of the Upper Tribunal) do not make it very easy to find the answer.

There

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll