header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Taxing Matters

RESIDENCE: COUNTING THE DAYS

The details have now been published about how days are to be counted for the purposes of determining UK residence. From 6 April 2008, days of arrival and departure will be counted as days in the UK. There are two strands to this proposal—a statutory change and change of practice. The statutory tests for both income tax and capital gains tax are that an individual will be resident in the UK if he spends 183 days or more in the UK. This has been the statutory rule for a couple of hundred years. There is no guidance about how you calculated the 183 day rule but the case of Wilkie v IRC [1952] Ch 153, [1952] 1 All ER 92 decided that hours and minutes could be taken into account in determining whether the limit was breached. The published HMRC practice for the last 50 years has been to ignore days of arrival and departure in counting days for the 183-day test and the same practice has been applied to the 91-day rule; if a person spends an average of 91 days in the UK over four years, they are normally treated as resident and ordinarily resident from the beginning of the fifth year.

From 6 April 2008, a day of presence for the purpose of calculating residence will include days on which the individual arrives in or departs from the UK. There will be an exception for transit passengers who do not leave the boat or aircraft, or stay airside. That will be the statutory rule and will apply only to the 183-day test. However, HMRC has announced that it will change its practice from 6 April 2008 in relation to the 91-day average so that for the purposes of this test the days of arrival and departure will similarly be taken into account.

Implications

While in principle this seems like a simple enough change, the implications are rather more wide ranging. If days of arrival and departure are both counted, what really matters is if you are in the UK at midnight because if you are, that is bound to count as two days.

Mr Brown seems to think that people who come here on Tuesday and leave on Thursday will become resident and be subject to UK tax. Er no. Wake up. They won’t come…or if they do, they will make quite sure that they do not stay the night but leave on the last flight. Similarly, they will not want to come here the night before a meeting so as to be refreshed and properly prepared; that would just add one more day to their tally so there is going to be a considerable demand for more early morning flights to the UK and more late flights out of the UK—and a corresponding reduction in the demand for hotel accommodation. Good news for foreign airlines and foreign hotels—but nobody in their right mind could think that this is anything but damaging to Great Britain Plc.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll